To flickr or to zooomr
October 29, 2006 – 9:28 pm | by Benjamin WattA few weeks back I decided to upgrade my digital camera from my trusty Sony DSC-P52 (simple, small, and served me well for a few years) to a Panasonic Lumix FZ50 (not quite a digital SLR, but it’s a lot closer to a ‘proper’ camera).
I’ve been wanting to try my hand at having more control over the photos I take, and this camera appealed to me – it’s a couple of versions newer than the FZ20 my brother owns which seemed a pretty nice camera. Anyway, I won’t bore you too much more on this, suffice to say – I’ve been taking a lot of photos and trying to read up on what all the controls I now find myself with, actually do. Oh, and I’ve been taking my photos in RAW and fiddling with them mainly in the beta of Adobe Photoshop Lightroom (pretty nifty).
Why I’m writing this post though is more about where I put the photos I take, once I’m ‘happy’ with them. Obviously, flickr’s the first port of call for most photographers, and as I’ve had an account there for over a year, I put up some of my initials shots from when I was in London last month. Everybody uses flickr right, so why use anything else?
Well, flickr to me seems a little clunky in places – I think as it’s spawned new features it’s maybe become a lot less usable. A case in point, I knew that flickr did Geotagging (marking on a map where you took the photo), but it took me far too long to figure out where I could actually do this. Even once I did, the unfortunate side effect of flickr being owned by Yahoo is that the maps they use are Yahoo’s – the detail in the UK is pathetic at best.
Enter zooomr. I’ve been aware of them for a fair bit of time. Being a regular reader of Scobleizer, and as a result now a keen watcher of some of the ScobleShow, or more specifically the fantastic Photowalking series, I’ve heard quite a lot about it. Anytime I’ve seen links of people’s photos leading back to zooomr, I’ve been taken with how nicely laid out and feature-filled it all looked.
So I signed up the other day, and then the whole site died. This hasn’t softened my enthusiasm for the site though, in fact reading the blog over the last three days as the site came back up, only proved to me that zooomr has been put together with some real dedication by the folks in charge, who seem very passionate about what they’re doing. Besides, this thing is still in beta (along with a heck of a lot of the rest of the Web 2.0 world). So, today when the site was fully available again, I uploaded my first photo – one I took at Edinburgh Zoo last week during some downtime whilst in Edinburgh on business. And what a nice experience it was too. Uploading was simple, geotagging was easy and used Google Maps (I could find the zoo!), and everything just clicked together in a clean, efficient way.
Sea Lion at Edinburgh Zoo Hosted on Zooomr
I have to say, this first experience certainly doesn’t make me want to go running back to flickr – I can see zooomr becoming my main (possibly only) place to upload my photos. Sure my photos won’t look that great, but at least the site they’re on is kind of cool
. Go read their description of the site’s features and their FAQ, and get started.
A quick disclaimer if I might: I did spend some time this afternoon trying to work out how to sign up to an unrestricted upload Pro account (much like flickr has if you can find it). There’s a link in the My Account section of zooomr that goes nowhere, but a quick Google search eventually showed me that these guys are (at least for now) giving Pro accounts away for free if you blog about them. Was I going to blog about this site anyway? Yes. Did the thought of a free Pro account make me be even nicer about them than I would otherwise have done? No, but it helped. Would I have paid money for a Pro account? Yes, and I will when that day comes (I presume it will eventually). Is this a cunningly excellent move on their part? Absolutely.
6 Responses to “To flickr or to zooomr”
By KarinM on Nov 27, 2006 | Reply
Have you checked out Twango http://www.twango.com yet? Also still in beta, I LOVE this file sharing site because it supports hundreds of file types so you can post photos, videos, Word docs, .zip, PDFs, you name it. It supports file sharing and commenting and folks don’t have to be members to comment. Best, viewers can download photos (if okay with owner). Great tools for uploading files to site (bulk upload tool allows drag/drop and resize on the fly), including emailing directly to different “channels” you set up or straight from your cellphone. And the free “Twigits” that make it easy to put Flash or Java photo feeds into blogs are being added all the time. Your videos are automatically made Podcastable – sweet. It supports hand sorting of photos… I’ve been using it a couple of months to share all kinds of stuff, on both private and public channels, and love it.
By benwatt on Nov 27, 2006 | Reply
I hadn’t even heard of it, truth be told. Seems an interesting option, I’ll certainly give it ago. Zooomr to me though has just a really nice community feel to it – can’t tell yet if Twango has that or not.
I guess it makes sense though having one site for lots of different media, but I still quite like having youtube for video, zooomr (or flickr I guess!) for photos, countless sites for music, and well – my hard drive for zips and pdfs. Yeah, that last one needs some work, maybe I do have room for Twango in my life
By Taavi on Apr 3, 2007 | Reply
I concur about the community feel. Part of it is because it is still quite small, part because Kris keeps it personal via the blog, partly because I’ve never ever seen any spam on Zooomr. Something that has pissed me off with flickr before.
By Benjamin Watt on Apr 3, 2007 | Reply
Flickr does seem to attract quite a lot of spammy comments. Time will tell if that same community feel stays if/when Zooomr gets larger.